T
TheCount
Nov 16, 2011

How likely are businesses to use DataSift for data analysis, and how useful of a metric is twitter traffic for business decision

DataSift, the British data analysis company, is opening up shop in San Francisco. They analyze twitter traffic in real time to track with people are saying about client companies or products. What do you think? Is this going to actually be useful, or is it more of a "huh, that's neat" kind of thing?

jimlynch
11/17/2011
I'm not a big fan of Twitter since there's so much babble on it. I suppose some of it might be useful, but I suspect there's also a lot of fluff that businesses won't find very useful.

Here's an interview with one of the DataSift guys that you might find interesting.

Bailey Discusses DataSift's Analysis of Twitter Feeds
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/bailey-discusses-datasifts-analys...

"Robert Bailey, chief executive officer of DataSift, talks about the company's analysis of data from social media companies and the outlook for customers. DataSift manages large volumes of information from social data sources including Twitter Inc. He speaks with Emily Chang on Bloomberg Television's "Bloomberg West.""
R
RomanZ
11/17/2011

 

My feeling is that it is both somewhat useful and "huh, that's neat".  It is interesting, and potentially valuable to be able to gauge  reaction to a new ad or ad campaign in real time.  If twitter and a method for analyzing twitter traffic had existed in 1984, for example, I'm sure reaction would have been off the charts when the MacIntosh commercial aired during the Super Bowl.  But in today's world, especially with viral marketing, it can take some time for an idea to implant itself into the mass consciousness.  Having some experience with Fortune 500 companies, the concern this generates is related to the VERY short amount of foresight many American companies have.  Everything is judged in 90 day cycles, because of earning reports, and anything that isn't fully realized in 90 days can result in investors panicking because they hear a rant on a morning business program about a missed earnings projection, even if those investors know essentially nothing about the core business and care even less about long-term strategic planning.  

 

That said, if there is a high cost advertising campaign deployed, it makes sense to have some metric that indicates effectiveness, especially if ad buys are ongoing.  What I wonder about with DataSift is if the quality of the twitter traffic is measured, and not just the quantity.  A good example of this would be the Groupon ad that aired during the Super Bowl this year, where it was widely perceived that Groupon was belittling the plight of Tibetans.  I suspect that there was heavy traffic about the ad, but a high percentage of it was negative.  So theoretically, an advert campaign that was found to be highly offensive could be mistakenly seen as highly effective.  I concede that some would say that there is no bad publicity, and that if people are talking (or tweeting) about your company, it is inherently positive.  If DataSift has accounted for this, though, I would think it could be a useful service.   

 

Answer this