S
Nov 14, 2011

What do you make out of recent reports claiming vulnerabilities in Amazon's AMI?

I've seen a couple of articles claiming that there are security vulnerabilities and backdoors. Clearly security is one major concern companies have with moving to a public cloud model. Amazon is such a huge player and has a pretty decent security history. Are these concerns about AMI well founded or bogus?

n
11/15/2011

I looked at one of the articles making these claims earlier this week, and to use your term, I think they are booooogus!  It looks like most of the issues arise from people not following security best practices.  If you leave passwords and sensitive information "laying around" unsecured and unencrypted and someone takes advantage of it, I don't see how that is Amazon's fault.  I have seen so many instances of guidelines and procedures not being followed at companies large and small that I am not really surprised that some people are sloppy when they should be more cautious. 

11/15/2011
Hi SilverHawk,

GigaOm had an article about and seemed to feel it was overblown, according to certain experts.

Amazon AMI vulnerabilities overblown, experts say
http://gigaom.com/cloud/amazon-ami-vulnerabilities-overblown-experts-say...

"Stories about potential security vulnerabilities strike a chord as more companies consider moving more of their IT workloads to public cloud infrastructure run by Amazon, Rackspace and others.

Security experts said this is more of a people problem than a technology issue in that some people deploying AMIs leave passwords, SSH keys and other data that should be locked away, unattended. That flies in the face of Amazon’s recommended practices and makes AMIs vulnerable to hackers.

The message from security experts was clear: Stupid users get what they deserve."
Answer this