IDG Answers is a community of experts who are passionate about technology. Ask a question or answer one below.
I think that you leave an important factor - the truth of the link does not matter. What we have seen in the EU is that many of the people who want to be removed from search results are people who have done bad things in the past, often actual criminal behavior. I have a problem with people being able to hide their crimes from other people. Frankly, I think that’s part of the punishment if you commit a crime and are convicted of it - other people get to know. On the other hand, if you are accused of a crime and then exonerated, I can easily see a valid reason for wanted that not to show up in search results.
I personally would have to think this through, and I don’t think enough thought was given to this policy by regulators before it was implemented. While I do think there are valid reasons for wanting to "be forgotten, an exception to the “right to be forgotten” should be carved out when someone is trying to conceal their past wrongdoing. Just imagine Bernie Madoff was out of jail and was offering you a “great” investment opportunity. You go search for him and it turns up nothing negative. Whose rights are being protected in that example? As it currently exists in the EU, the right to be forgotten can also be the right to deceive others about oneself.